No broadcast via config tool with two NICs enabled
Serial-to-Ethernet & ConfigTool
No replies yet. Be the first to reply.
Join the discussion.
Serial-to-Ethernet & ConfigTool
No replies yet. Be the first to reply.
Join the discussion.
Share projects and connect with makers.
Joined before the site update? first.
New to WIZnet Makers?
We sent a verification link to your address. Open it to activate your account, then log in.
Accounts from this email provider are reviewed by an administrator after verification. Approval usually takes one business day.
Already have an account?
Enter your email address. If it belongs to an account, we'll send a link to set a new password. Members who joined before the site update use this to set their password.
If an account uses that address, we sent a link to set a new password. The link works once and expires in 30 minutes.
Know your password?
Need an account?
RE: No broadcast via config tool with two NICs enabled
by irina WIZnet ·
Hi Markus,
I guess it caused by priority of network adapters. (Metric)
it can be seen using ‘route print’ command on windows command console (can be entered by using a ‘cmd’ command)
Please Try adjusting each adapter’s ‘interface metric’ value in IP Settings tab (in Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) Properties).
(notice: lower metric means higher priority of network adapters)
Please refer to ‘How to change the interface metric on a network adapter’ in next link:
support.microsoft.com/kb/894564
support.microsoft.com/kb/299540
Regards,
Eric.
RE: No broadcast via config tool with two NICs enabled
by Markus8 ·
Hi Eric,
first, thanks for the ‘metric’ hint! 10 points out of 10.
Still, if there is more than one adapter installed on the system, the broadcast is send only once, via the adapter with the highest priority.
This has to do something with the address: 255.255.255.255:50001 the broadcast message is send to. If I specify the adapter on the multicast socket and change the address to let’s say: 235.255.255.255:50001 the message is actually send via all adapters. Doing the same with the original address only sends it to the most prior adapter.
Do you have any hint on that one, too?
Regadrs,
Markus