Pull up and pull down placement
Ethernet Chips
No replies yet. Be the first to reply.
Join the discussion.
Ethernet Chips
No replies yet. Be the first to reply.
Join the discussion.
Share projects and connect with makers.
Joined before the site update? first.
New to WIZnet Makers?
We sent a verification link to your address. Open it to activate your account, then log in.
Accounts from this email provider are reviewed by an administrator after verification. Approval usually takes one business day.
Already have an account?
Enter your email address. If it belongs to an account, we'll send a link to set a new password. Members who joined before the site update use this to set their password.
If an account uses that address, we sent a link to set a new password. The link works once and expires in 30 minutes.
Know your password?
Need an account?
RE: Pull up and pull down placement
by Eugeny ·
You can find layout guide here.
This must answer your question. But using FPC cable… not sure it is good way to extend the conductors. I used board-to-board through-hole connection (no connectors, soldering) and the cumulative length of each conductor was less than 2 inches, and it worked well, but using cables… You probably need twisted pair FPC cable!
RE: RE: Pull up and pull down placement
by Naveen S Kurdekar ·
Thanks for the valuable response Eugeny. It really helped.
Is there a way we can get our layout reviewed from Wiznet?
Thanks,
Naveen
RE: Pull up and pull down placement
by Eugeny ·
Not sure if there’s such service. If layout is not a secret post related pics here.
RE: Pull up and pull down placement
by Naveen S Kurdekar ·
RJ45_EVT.pdf
Hi Eugeny,
PFA the layout in pdf format. This is the sub board where we have Discrete magnetics and Ethernet connector. The W5500 chip is on a main board. There is an FPC running from the main board to Ethernet sub board. The length of the TX and RX lines are less than 12cm.
Thanks,
Naveen
RE: Pull up and pull down placement
by Eugeny ·
If the pinout of the connector is not fixed, you can reassign the pins to eliminate lane crossings at different board levels.
The board is not serviceable (if serviceability is assumed at all) - you get the guidelines too literally putting components the way you would not be able to replace them if needed.
I am not sure, but you may need to increase clearance between signal ground and network connector ground polygons.
In addition the right hole for network connector mounting significantly decreases strength of the board, and therefore its durability for forcing/bending.