Profinet suitability
Ethernet Chips
No replies yet. Be the first to reply.
Join the discussion.
Ethernet Chips
No replies yet. Be the first to reply.
Join the discussion.
Share projects and connect with makers.
Joined before the site update? first.
New to WIZnet Makers?
We sent a verification link to your address. Open it to activate your account, then log in.
Accounts from this email provider are reviewed by an administrator after verification. Approval usually takes one business day.
Already have an account?
Enter your email address. If it belongs to an account, we'll send a link to set a new password. Members who joined before the site update use this to set their password.
If an account uses that address, we sent a link to set a new password. The link works once and expires in 30 minutes.
Know your password?
Need an account?
RE: Profinet suitability
by tuna ·
Good question. I am looking to port some Profinet code to the W5500 (or W5300, which I believe will be somewhat faster, due to the parallel i/f - need to confirm). From this app note http://wizwiki.net/wiki/doku.php?id=products:w5500:application:pppoe recommended in another thread, it seems like it won’t be too difficult. Even at 1ms/1KHz cyclic packet rate, it’s a pretty light load.
FWIW, our host processor will be a fairly high-spec STM32. I seriously considered using its on-board MAC, but, for a few different reasons, I’ve come to the conclusion that leveraging the WizNet chip will probably be the better option overall.
RE: RE: Profinet suitability
by Mxyxixptlick ·
What made you decide against using the on-board MAC?
RE: Profinet suitability
by Eugeny ·
Allocate the whole RX/TX space for the MACRAW socket 0. Remember that if you will not flush packets in time all incoming packets not fitting into the buffer’s free space will be discarded.
RE: Profinet suitability
by Matt ·
Did you ever find out if w5500 is suitable for Profinet?